The Republican Zoopolis: Towards A New Legitimation Framework for Relational Animal Ethics

Ethics and the Environment 21 (1):61-88 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

An alternative to the negative rights slant in animal rights, focusing on abolition and hands-off approaches, has now surfaced within critical animal studies. Indeed, Relational Animal Rights Theory lays a foundation for positive relations of care, mutuality and dependence between species. In so doing, the theory is sensitive to the multitude of ways in which human and non-human animals interact across shared territories. Perhaps the most fruitful development with RART is offered by Donaldson and Kymlicka, insofar as it extends a positive relation also to wild animals. They present a tripartite framework for moral obligations toward non-human...

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-07-03

Downloads
35 (#639,350)

6 months
13 (#245,997)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Philip Allen
East Tennessee State University

Citations of this work

A republic for all sentients: Social freedom without free will.Eze Paez - 2021 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 103 (3):620-644.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references