The Republican Zoopolis: Towards A New Legitimation Framework for Relational Animal Ethics

Ethics and the Environment 21 (1):61-88 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

An alternative to the negative rights slant in animal rights, focusing on abolition and hands-off approaches, has now surfaced within critical animal studies. Indeed, Relational Animal Rights Theory lays a foundation for positive relations of care, mutuality and dependence between species. In so doing, the theory is sensitive to the multitude of ways in which human and non-human animals interact across shared territories. Perhaps the most fruitful development with RART is offered by Donaldson and Kymlicka, insofar as it extends a positive relation also to wild animals. They present a tripartite framework for moral obligations toward non-human...

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 105,131

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-07-03

Downloads
37 (#678,535)

6 months
4 (#1,011,530)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Philip Allen
East Tennessee State University

Citations of this work

A republic for all sentients: Social freedom without free will.Eze Paez - 2021 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 103 (3):620-644.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references