The Problem of Method: Deleuze and Simondon

Deleuze and Guattari Studies 14 (1):87-108 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between Simondon's theory of individuation and Deleuze's transcendental empiricism. Deleuze credits Simondon with inventing a new conception of the transcendental – a claim that might have taken Simondon by surprise, as this term does not play any significant role in his oeuvre. The aim of this paper is to show both that Simondon's philosophy contributed to the construction of Deleuze's transcendental philosophy in an essential way and that the nature of his own project is radically different from Deleuze's. The most important divergence between the two thinkers lies arguably in their respective methods. What this difference brings to the fore is Deleuze's adherence to the philosophical traditions of idealism and structuralism at this stage of his thought.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,809

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-05-03

Downloads
48 (#456,638)

6 months
13 (#253,952)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniela Voss
Universität Hildesheim

References found in this work

On the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects.Gilbert Simondon - 2011 - Deleuze and Guatarri Studies 5 (3):407-424.
Artmachines: Deleuze, Guattari, Simondon.Anne Sauvagnargues, Suzanne Verderber & Eugene W. Holland - 2016 - Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Edited by Suzanne Verderber, Eugene W. Holland & Gregory Flaxman.
Deleuze's Concept of Quasi-cause.Jon Roffe - 2017 - Deleuze and Guatarri Studies 11 (2):278-294.
Forme, information, potentiels: Exposé.Gilbert Simondon - 1960 - Société Française de Philosophie, Bulletin 54 (4).

Add more references