- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Arno R. lodder, dialaw: On legal justification and dialogical models of argumentation. Law and philosophy library vol. 42 [Book Review]
Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (2-3):265-276 (2000)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
DiaLaw. On legal justification and dialogical models of argumentation.Arno R. Lodder - 1999 - Dordrecht, Boston and London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Acts of Arguing, A Rhetorical Model of Argument (ARNO R. LODDER).C. W. Tindale - 1999 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 9 (1):73-78.
Review of Studies in legal logic series: Law and philosophy library by Hage, Jaap, Vol. 70, Springer, New York 2005. [REVIEW]John Reviewer-Rooney - 2006 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 14 (1):159-160.
Ruth Amossy: In defense of polemics, Springer, Argumentation Library, Volume 42, 2021. [REVIEW]Jean-Claude Guerrini - 2022 - Argumentation 36 (3):447-451.
A dialogical theory of legal discussions:Pragma-dialectical analysis and evaluation of legalargumentation.Eveline T. Feteris - 2000 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (2-3):115-135.
Jaap Hage, reasoning with rules: An essay on legal reasoning and its underlying logic. Law and philosophy library. [REVIEW]Ronald P. Loui - 2000 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (4):353-358.
Thirty years of Artificial Intelligence and Law: the first decade. [REVIEW]Guido Governatori, Trevor Bench-Capon, Bart Verheij, Michał Araszkiewicz, Enrico Francesconi & Matthias Grabmair - 2022 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 30 (4):481-519.
The Pleadings Games: An Artificial Intelligence Model of Procedural Justice.Thomas F. Gordon - 1995 - Springer.
The Rational Reconstruction of Complex Forms of Legal Argumentation: Approaches from Artificial Intelligence and Law and Pragma-Dialectics. [REVIEW]Eveline T. Feteris - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (4):393-400.
A. Lodder (1990), On Legal Justification and Dialog Games. Maastricht: Dissertation University of Maastricht. [REVIEW]Richard Starmans - 2000 - Argumentation 14 (2):195-200.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
46 (#484,816)
6 months
7 (#730,543)
2009-01-28
Downloads
46 (#484,816)
6 months
7 (#730,543)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning.Douglas Neil Walton & Erik C. W. Krabbe - 1995 - Albany, NY, USA: State University of New York Press.
The New Dialectic: Conversational Contexts of Argument.Douglas Walton - 1998 - University of Toronto Press.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-lxkd2 dc2