- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Research participation: Are we subject to a duty?
American Journal of Bioethics 5 (1):48 – 49 (2005)
Abstract
This Article does not have an abstractAuthor's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Review of David Wasserman, Jerome Bickenbach, Robert Wachbroit (eds.), Quality of Life and Human Difference. [REVIEW]Kevin McDonnell - 2006 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2006 (1).
We should reject passive resignation in favor of requiring the assent of younger children for participation in nonbeneficial research.Robert M. Nelson & William W. Reynolds - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (4):11 – 13.
Waste not, want not: Cognitive impairment should not preclude research participation.Gavin W. Hougham - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (1):36 – 37.
Participation as commodity, participation as gift.Tod Chambers - 2001 - American Journal of Bioethics 1 (2):48.
Children's consent to research participation: Social context and personal experience invalidate fixed cutoff rules.Richard Ashcroft, Trudy Goodenough, Emma Williamson & Julie Kent - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (4):16 – 18.
A Kantian duty to commit suicide and its implications for bioethics.Rosamond Rhodes - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (6):45 – 47.
The duty to rescue and the limits of confidentiality.Michael Boylan - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (2):32 – 34.
When do genetic researchers have a duty to recontact study participants?Christopher H. Wade & Andrea L. Kalfoglou - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (6):26 – 27.
Primary care physicians and the duty to inform about genetic discrimination.Anita Silvers - 2001 - American Journal of Bioethics 1 (3):1 – 2.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
35 (#651,676)
6 months
3 (#1,481,767)
2009-01-28
Downloads
35 (#651,676)
6 months
3 (#1,481,767)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
A Duty to Participate in Research: Does Social Context Matter?Inmaculada de Melo-Martín - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (10):28-36.
When is normative recruitment legitimate?Lars Øystein Ursin & Berge Solberg - 2008 - Etikk I Praksis - Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics 2 (2):93-113.
Reflections on 'rethinking research ethics'.Robert J. Levine - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (1):1 – 3.
Response to Commentators on “Rethinking Research Ethics”.Rosamond Rhodes - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (1):W15-W18.
References found in this work
False Hopes and Best Data: Consent to Research and the Therapeutic Misconception.Paul S. Appelbaum, Loren H. Roth, Charles W. Lidz, Paul Benson & William Winslade - 1987 - Hastings Center Report 17 (2):20-24.
Consent to clinical research--adequately voluntary or substantially influenced?S. Hewlett - 1996 - Journal of Medical Ethics 22 (4):232-237.
Does Research Ethics Rest on a Mistake? The Common Good, Reasonable Risk and Social Justice.Alex John London - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (1):37 – 39.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-sfdq8 dc2