Causality, necessity and the cosmological argument

Philosophical Studies 36 (3):261 - 270 (1979)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I distinguish between a causeless being, An essentially causeless being, And a logically necessary being, And argue that only a logically necessary being can provide an adequate answer to the question, "why do contingent and dependent beings exist?" I also argue that recent attempts to show that if a being is essentially causeless, It is logically necessary, Are unsound

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,937

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Stephen Davis’s objection to the second ontological argument.Bashar Alhoch - 2016 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 80 (1):3-9.
Hick, Necessary Being, and the Cosmological Argument.D. R. Duff-Forbes - 1972 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 1 (4):473 - 483.
The cosmological argument and the causal principle.Bruce R. Reichenbach - 1975 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 6 (3):185 - 190.
Varieties of Ontological Argument.Howard Robinson - 2012 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 4 (2):41--64.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
79 (#265,091)

6 months
15 (#206,160)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references