Abstract

In the past few years philosophers of religion and theologians have devoted much attention to the status of religious statements. There are three main positions: The statements as generally understood are empirical statements. The people who make them have either made honest mistakes or they are irrational. This view may be coupled with the claim that religious language can be reconstructed in such a way that we may continue to use it and yet avoid making false assertions. The statements are not empirical and are therefore not significant. The statements are not empirical— common sense and science are irrelevant to the truth and falsity of religious claims—and yet they are significant.