A Categorical Characterization of Accessible Domains

Dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Inductively defined structures are ubiquitous in mathematics; their specification is unambiguous and their properties are powerful. All fields of mathematical logic feature these structures prominently: the formula of a language, the set of theorems, the natural numbers, the primitive recursive functions, the constructive number classes and segments of the cumulative hierarchy of sets. This dissertation gives a mathematical characterization of a species of inductively defined structures, called accessible domains, which include all of the above examples except the set of theorems. The concept of an accessible domain comes from Wilfried Sieg's analysis of proof-theoretic practices, starting with his dissertation. In particular, he noticed the special epistemological character of elements of an accessible domain: they can always be uniquely identified with their build-up. Generally, the unique build-up of elements justifies the principles of induction and recursion. I use category theory to give an abstract characterization of accessible domains. I claim that accessible domains are all instances of initial algebras for endofunctors. Grounded in the historical roots of Sieg's discussions, this dissertation shows how the properties of initial algebras for endofunctors and accessible domains coincide in a satisfying and natural way. Filling out this characterization, I show how important examples of accessible domains fit into this broad characterization. I first characterize some accessible domains by relatively simple functors (e.g. finite, polynomial, those that preserve certain colimits) where we can see how iterating the functor can produce the accessible domain. Then I describe accessible domains that result from more involved specifications (e.g. ordinals and segments of the cumulative hierarchies associated with CZF, IZF, and ZF) by relying heavily on algebraic set theory. I end with a discussion of some of the methodological features of category theory in particular that helped characterize accessible domains.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Tameness, powerful images, and large cardinals.Will Boney & Michael Lieberman - 2020 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 21 (1):2050024.
Abstract elementary classes and accessible categories.Tibor Beke & Jirí Rosický - 2012 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 163 (12):2008-2017.
A rational reconstruction of the domain of feature structures.M. Andrew Moshier - 1995 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 4 (2):111-143.
Total objects in inductively defined types.Lill Kristiansen & Dag Normann - 1997 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 36 (6):405-436.
On effective topological spaces.Dieter Spreen - 1998 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 63 (1):185-221.
L-domains as locally continuous sequent calculi.Longchun Wang & Qingguo Li - 2024 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 63 (3):405-425.
Metric abstract elementary classes as accessible categories.M. Lieberman & J. Rosický - 2017 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 82 (3):1022-1040.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-04-17

Downloads
356 (#77,444)

6 months
86 (#68,765)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Patrick Walsh
Carnegie Mellon University

Citations of this work

Pasch's empiricism as methodological structuralism.Dirk Schlimm - 2020 - In Erich H. Reck & Georg Schiemer (eds.), The Pre-History of Mathematical Structuralism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 80-105.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references