A Common Law Theory of Judicial Review

Problema 1:117-139 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Constitutional Charters or Bill of Rights have been applauded because of the protection they provide to minorities and also in ensuring and protecting fundamental rights, however, Charters have been criticized for being considered morally and politically objectionable. The author responds to Charter critics most serious objections and offers some reasons for adopting an alternative framework.

Other Versions

reprint Waluchow, W. J. (2007) "A Common Law Theory of Judicial Review". Problema. Anuario de Filosofía y Teoria Del Derecho 1(1):117-139

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,888

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Common Law Theory Of Judicial Review By W.J. Waluchow.Bradley Miller - 2007 - American Journal of Jurisprudence 52 (1):297-312.
Politician, Judges, and the Charter.L. Sumner - 2008 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 21 (1):227-238.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-02-28

Downloads
1 (#1,944,520)

6 months
1 (#1,886,937)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

What Is Legal Philosophy?Matthew H. Kramer - 2012 - Metaphilosophy 43 (1-2):125-134.
Una defensa Del positivismo jurídico.Roberto M. Jiménez Cano - 2013 - Isonomía. Revista de Teoría y Filosofía Del Derecho 39:83-126.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references