How Narrow is Aristotle's Contemplative Ideal?

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 94 (3):558-583 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In Nicomachean Ethics X.7–8, Aristotle defends a striking view about the good for human beings. According to Aristotle, the single happiest way of life is organized around philosophical contemplation. According to the narrowness worry, however, Aristotle's contemplative ideal is unduly Procrustean, restrictive, inflexible, and oblivious of human diversity. In this paper, I argue that Aristotle has resources for responding to the narrowness worry, and that his contemplative ideal can take due account of human diversity.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-05-27

Downloads
901 (#24,591)

6 months
117 (#48,998)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Matthew D. Walker
Yale-NUS College

Citations of this work

Aristotle on Divine and Human Contemplation.Bryan C. Reece - 2020 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 7:131–160.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Well-being: its meaning, measurement, and moral importance.James Griffin - 1986 - Oxford [Oxfordshire]: Clarendon Press.
Ethics with Aristotle.Sarah Broadie - 1991 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The will to power.Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche - 1967 - New York,: Random House. Edited by Walter Arnold Kaufmann & R. J. Hollingdale.
Essays, Moral, Political, and Literary.David Hume - 1875 - Indianapolis: Liberty Press. Edited by Eugene F. Miller.

View all 65 references / Add more references