Moral Sense Theory and the Development of Kant's Ethics

Dissertation, University of Western Ontario (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This dissertation investigates a number of ways in which an eighteenth century British philosophical movement known as “moral sense theory” influenced the development of German philosopher Immanuel Kant’s (1724-1804) moral theory. I illustrate that Kant found both moral sense theory’s conception of moral judgement and its conception of moral motivation appealing during the earliest stage of his philosophical development, but eventually came to reject its conception of moral judgement, though even in his early writings Kant preserves certain features of its conception of moral motivation. In the mature presentation of his moral philosophy Kant offers detailed objections to moral sense theory’s conception of moral judgement, but I illustrate that, in opposition to the claims of many recent interpreters, his considered understanding of moral motivation has only a few superficial features in common with the view presented by Hutcheson in particular. Important for an understanding of Kant’s mature conception of motivation is also the thought of Adam Smith (1723-1790), a thinker who is not part of but was highly influenced by moral sense theory. I illustrate that Smith’s notion of the attitude of “regard” for what he calls the “general rules of conduct,” as well as his conception of the “sense of duty,” influenced Kant’s conception of “respect [Achtung]” for the moral law. Finally, I illustrate that Kant’s understanding of the pleasure associated with acting morally, what he calls “self-contentment [Selbstzufriedenheit],” can be clarified in light of how Hutcheson solves a problem related to the pleasure of the moral sense.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,676

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hutcheson and Kant: Moral Sense and Moral Feeling.Michael Walschots - 2017 - In Elizabeth Robinson & Chris W. Surprenant (eds.), Kant and the Scottish Enlightenment. New York: Routledge. pp. 36-54.
Achtung in Kant and Smith.Michael Walschots - 2022 - Kant Studien 113 (2):238-268.
What Emerged: Autonomy and Heteronomy in the Groundwork and Second Critique.Andrews Reath - 2018 - In Stefano Bacin & Oliver Sensen (eds.), The Emergence of Autonomy in Kant’s Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 176–195.
What Emerged: Autonomy and Heteronomy in the Groundwork and Second Critique.Andrews Reath - 2018 - In Stefano Bacin & Oliver Sensen (eds.), The Emergence of Autonomy in Kant’s Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 176-195.
Kant and the possibility of moral motivation.Mark Timmons - 1985 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 23 (3):377-398.
Kant's Theory of Motivation and Rational Agency.Paula Satne - 2009 - Dissertation, The University of Manchester
Kant’s Conception of Conscience.Umut Eldem - 2020 - Con-Textos Kantianos 1 (11):110-131.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-09-06

Downloads
54 (#398,413)

6 months
4 (#1,244,521)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Walschots
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz

Citations of this work

Kant's Theory of Moral Motivation.Vivek K. Radhakrishnan - 2022 - Dissertation, Manipal Academy of Higher Education

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references