- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
One-Sided Arguments: A Dialectical Analysis of Bias
Albany, NY, USA: State University of New York Press (1999)
Abstract
A practical manual for evaluating bias that will be useful to anyone who has to deal with arguments, whether in academic reading or writing, or in everyday conversation.Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Douglas Walton, One-Sided Arguments: A Dialectical Analysis of Bias. [REVIEW]Andrew Aberdein - 2001 - Philosophy in Review 21 (2):152-154.
Appeal to pity: A case study of theargumentum ad misericordiam. [REVIEW]Douglas Walton - 1995 - Argumentation 9 (5):769-784.
Douglas Walton, The Appeal to Pity: Argumentum ad Misericordiam.Alan G. Gross - 1999 - Pragmatics and Cognition 7 (1):223-226.
Good Arguments: An Introduction to Critical Thinking.C. A. Missimer - 1986 - Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall.
Douglas Walton, Appeal to Pity: Argumentum ad Misericordiam. [REVIEW]Robert Kimball - 1998 - Philosophy in Review 18:383-385.
Douglas Walton, Appeal to Pity: Argumentum ad Misericordiam Reviewed by.Robert H. Kimball - 1998 - Philosophy in Review 18 (5):383-385.
Douglas Walton (2000), Scare Tactics: Arguments that Appeal to Fear and Threats. [REVIEW]Robert C. Pinto - 2004 - Argumentation 18 (2):261-269.
Douglas Walton, Appeal to Expert Opinion: Arguments from Authority. [REVIEW]Robert Kimball - 1999 - Philosophy in Review 19:154-156.
Douglas Walton (2000), Scare Tactics: Arguments that Appeal to Fear and Threats. [REVIEW]Robert C. Pinto - 2004 - Argumentation 18 (2):261-269.
Analytics
Added to PP
2021-11-17
Downloads
14 (#1,276,532)
6 months
7 (#706,906)
2021-11-17
Downloads
14 (#1,276,532)
6 months
7 (#706,906)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Dialectical Relevance and Dialogical Context in Walton’s Pragmatic Theory.Fabrizio Macagno - 2008 - Informal Logic 28 (2):102-128.
Wrenching from Context: The Manipulation of Commitments.Douglas Walton & Fabrizio Macagno - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (3):283-317.
Conditional assertion, denial, and supposition as illocutionary acts.John T. Kearns - 2006 - Linguistics and Philosophy 29 (4):455 - 485.
In memoriam Douglas N. Walton: the influence of Doug Walton on AI and law.Katie Atkinson, Trevor Bench-Capon, Floris Bex, Thomas F. Gordon, Henry Prakken, Giovanni Sartor & Bart Verheij - 2020 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 28 (3):281-326.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-2pm92 dc2