Responsibility and Priority in Liver Transplantation

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 18 (1):23-35 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a provocative 1991 paper, Alvin Moss and Mark Siegler argued that it may be fair to give individuals with alcohol-related end-stage liver disease lower priority for a liver transplant than those who develop end-stage liver disease from other factors. Like other organs, there is a substantial gap between the available livers for transplantation and the number of people who need liver transplants. Yet, unlike those with end-stage renal disease, who can survive for some time on dialysis before receiving a kidney transplant, those with liver failure will die without a liver transplant

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,169

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Case Vignettes in Transplant Psychiatry Ethics.H. Paul Chin - 2022 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 31 (3):386-394.
Responsibility, alcoholism, and liver transplantation.Walter Glannon - 1998 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (1):31 – 49.
Notes from an Organ Recipient: Once is Enough.Annie Klebahn Condon - 2022 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 31 (3):400-402.
The Case of the Criminal Liver.Ruchika Mishra - 2011 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (1):143-143.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
163 (#150,298)

6 months
19 (#161,561)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?