The McKinsey axiom is not compact

Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (4):1230-1238 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,676

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The McKinsey axiom is not canonical.Robert Goldblatt - 1991 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (2):554-562.
Canonicity for intensional logics with even axioms.Timothy J. Surendonk - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (3):1141-1156.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
84 (#248,348)

6 months
15 (#200,807)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Canonicity for intensional logics without iterative axioms.Timothy J. Surendonk - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (4):391-409.
Intentional identity revisited.Ahti Pietarinen - 2010 - Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic 6 (2):147-188.
Canonicity for intensional logics with even axioms.Timothy J. Surendonk - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (3):1141-1156.
Uncompactness of Stit Logics Containing Generalized Refref Conditionals.Ming Xu - 1998 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 39 (4):485-506.

Add more citations

References found in this work

An incomplete logic containing S.Kit Fine - 1974 - Theoria 40 (1):23-29.

Add more references