Verifying epistemic protocols under common knowledge

Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge - Tark ’09:257--266 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Epistemic protocols are communication protocols aiming at transfer of knowledge in a controlled way. Typically, the preconditions or goals for protocol actions depend on the knowledge of agents, often in nested form. Informal epistemic protocol descriptions for muddy children, coordinated attack, dining cryptographers, Russian cards, secret key exchange are well known. The contribution of this paper is a formal study of a natural requirement on epistemic protocols, that the contents of the protocol can be assumed to be common knowledge. By formalizing this requirement we can prove that there can be no unbiased deterministic protocol for the Russian cards problem. For purposes of our formal analysis we introduce an epistemic protocol language, and we show that its model checking problem is decidable.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Intensional Protocols for Dynamic Epistemic Logic.Suzanne Wijk, Rasmus Rendsvig & Hanna Lee - 2019 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 48 (6):1077-1118.
Verifying one hundred prisoners and a lightbulb.Hans van Ditmarsch & Jan van Eijck - 2010 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 20 (3):173-191.
Knowledge condition games.Sieuwert van Otterloo, Wiebe Van Der Hoek & Michael Wooldridge - 2006 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 15 (4):425-452.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-12-20

Downloads
15 (#1,222,397)

6 months
2 (#1,692,400)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Yanjing Wang
Peking University
Jan Van Eijck
University of Amsterdam

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references