More download options

Folk psychological ceteris paribus laws?

Ted A. Warfield

Philosophical Studies 71 (1):99-112 (1993) Copy BIBT_EX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Cite

Plain text

BibTeX

Formatted text

Reference Manager

RefWorks

Options

Mark as duplicate

Find it on Scholar

Request removal from index

Revision history

Author's Profile

University of Notre Dame

Categories

Ceteris Paribus Laws in General Philosophy of Science

Psychological Laws in Philosophy of Cognitive Science

Keywords

Folk Psychology Language Proposition Sentence Schiffer, S

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/bf00989728

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

Upload a copy of this work Papers currently archived: 100,154

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
Configure custom resolver

My notes

Sign in to use this feature

Similar books and articles

Horgan and Tienson on ceteris paribus laws.Marcello Guarini - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (2):301-315.

Horgan and Tienson on ceteris paribus laws.G. Marcello - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (2):301-315.

Psychological laws and nonmonotonic logic.Arnold Silverberg - 1996 - Erkenntnis 44 (2):199-224.

The Metaphysics of Ceteris Paribus Laws.Markus Schrenk - 2007 - ontos.

The belief-desire law.Christopher Gauker - 2005 - Facta Philosophica 7 (2):121-144.

Ceteris Paribus Laws.Emma Tobin - 2004 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 12 (4):498.

Ceteris Paribus Laws and Psychological Explanations.Charles Wallis - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:388-397.

Anomalous monism, ceteris paribus, and psychological explanation.Robert Klee - 1992 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43 (3):389-403.

In defense of psychological laws.Martin Carrier - 1998 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12 (3):217-232.

Ceteris paribus laws.Stephen Schiffer - 1991 - Mind 100 (397):1-17.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
106 (#198,399)

6 months
7 (#673,909)

Historical graph of downloads

How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

University of Notre Dame

Citations of this work

Why is there anything except physics?Barry Loewer - 2009 - Synthese 170 (2):217 - 233.

A Multiply Qualified Conditional Analysis of Disposition Ascription: Mapping the Conceptual Topography of Ceteris Paribus.Jesse R. Steinberg & Alan M. Steinberg - 2017 - Erkenntnis 82 (4):777-793.

How the Ceteris Paribus Laws of Physics Lie.Geert Keil - 2005 - In Jan Faye, Paul Needham, Uwe Scheffler & Max Urchs (eds.), Nature's Principles. Springer. pp. 167-200.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind.Jerry A. Fodor - 1987 - MIT Press. Edited by Margaret A. Boden.

Remnants of Meaning.Stephen R. Schiffer - 1987 - MIT Press.

You can fool some of the people all of the time, everything else being equal: Hedged laws and psychological explanation.Jerry A. Fodor - 1991 - Mind 100 (397):19-34.

Ceteris paribus laws.Stephen Schiffer - 1991 - Mind 100 (397):1-17.

Review of P sychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning In the Philosophy of Mind. [REVIEW]Jay L. Garfield - 1991 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51 (1):235-240.

View all 6 references / Add more references