In Felipe De Brigard & Walter Sinnott-Armstrong,
Neuroscience and philosophy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press (
2022)
Copy
BIBTEX
Abstract
The fast-developing
field of neuroscience has given philosophy, as well as
other disciplines and the public broadly, many new tools and perspectives
for investigating one of our most pressing challenges: addressing the health
and well-being
of our mental lives. In some cases, neuroscientific innovation
has led to clearer understanding of the mechanisms of mental illness
and precise new modes of treatment. In other cases, features of neuroscience
itself, such as the enticing nature of the data it produces compared to
previous behavioral methods, together with its costliness and “coldness”
have complicated understanding of mental illness and decision making
about mental illness. Taking neuroscientific information into account can
leave practitioners in psychiatry and law with difficult questions, stemming
not only from the complexity of these fields, but also from our rapidly
evolving understanding of and facility with neuroscience. In this chapter,
we will review several examples of the insights and dilemmas that have
unfolded as mental illness has been examined through the lens of neuroscience,
covering diagnoses such as obsessive-compulsive
disorder (OCD),
schizophrenia, addiction, and severe mood disorders.