"Methods of Argumentation," by Douglas Walton [Book Review]

Teaching Philosophy 37 (4):568-572 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.5840/teachphil201437445

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,203

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Review of Argumentation methods for artificial intelligence in law by Douglas Walton, Springer-Verlag Berlin and Heidelberg GmbH & Co. K, 2005. [REVIEW]Jelle Reviewer-van Veenen - 2006 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 14 (1):155-157.
Douglas Neil Walton.Erik C. W. Krabbe & Bart Verheij - 2020 - Argumentation 35 (3):513-518.
Douglas Walton, The Place of Emotion in Argument.M. Wreen - 1995 - Argumentation 9:859-862.
Walton, Douglas (1998). Ad Hominem Arguments. [REVIEW]John Woods - 2001 - Argumentation 15 (4):503-507.
Douglas N. Walton, A Pragmatic Theory of Fallacy.Ralph H. Johnson - 1998 - Argumentation 12 (1):115-123.
Douglas N. Walton, Informal Logic: A Handbook for Critical Argumentation Reviewed by.Leo Groarke - 1990 - Philosophy in Review 10 (7):294-296.
Douglas N. Walton, A Pragmatic Theory of Fallacy. [REVIEW]Ralph H. Johnson - 1998 - Argumentation 12 (1):115-123.
Douglas Walton, The Place of Emotion in Argument.S. Planalp - 1995 - Argumentation 9:857-859.
Douglas Walton (1995) Arguments from Ignorance. [REVIEW]Michael Wreen - 2000 - Argumentation 14 (1):51-55.
Walton, Douglas (1998). Ad Hominem Arguments.John Woods - 2001 - Argumentation 15 (4):503-507.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-31

Downloads
15 (#1,278,503)

6 months
1 (#1,572,794)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references