Tarski's theory of truth and field's solution to the problem of intentionality

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 71 (3):291 – 304 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,154

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Stalnaker and Field on Truth and Intentionality.Carol Ruth Gabriel - 1990 - Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst
Truth, the Liar, and Tarski's Semantics.Gila Sher - 2002 - In Dale Jacquette (ed.), A Companion to Philosophical Logic. Malden, MA, USA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 143–163.
Field's Paradox and Its Medieval Solution.Stephen Read - 2010 - History and Philosophy of Logic 31 (2):161-176.
A new defense of Tarski's solution to the liar paradox.Gila Sher - 2022 - Philosophical Studies 180 (5-6):1441-1466.
Was Tarski's Theory of Truth Motivated by Physicalism?Greg Frost-Arnold - 2004 - History and Philosophy of Logic 25 (4):265-280.
What Is a Tarskian Definition of Truth?Manuel García-Carpintero - 1996 - Philosophical Studies 82 (2):113 - 144.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
63 (#332,799)

6 months
7 (#673,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

On the neglect of the philosophy of chemistry.J. van Brakel - 1999 - Foundations of Chemistry 1 (2):111-174.
What do propositions measure in folk psychology?Peter Weatherall - 1996 - Philosophical Psychology 9 (3):365-80.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Language of Thought.Jerry Fodor - 1975 - Harvard University Press.
Inquiry.Robert Stalnaker - 1984 - Cambridge University Press.
The Language of Thought.J. A. Fodor - 1978 - Critica 10 (28):140-143.

View all 11 references / Add more references