Reply to Bjørdal

Review of Symbolic Logic 4 (1):109-113 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/s1755020310000304

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,553

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Reply to Zach Weber.Hartry Field - 2020 - Australasian Philosophical Review 4 (2):178-182.
Reply to Crispin Wright and Richard Zach.Ian Rumfitt - 2018 - Philosophical Studies 175 (8):2091-2103.
Paradoxes and Inconsistent Mathematics.Zach Weber - 2021 - New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Review: Rudolf Carnap, Reply to Nelson Goodman. [REVIEW]C. West Churchman - 1948 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 13 (2):121-121.
Review: Avrum Stroll, Believing the Meaningless: A Reply to Mr. Mellor. [REVIEW]E. J. Lemmon - 1957 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 22 (4):390-391.
Review: Reply to Gaus, Richardson, and Weber. [REVIEW]Christopher McMahon - 2003 - Philosophical Studies 116 (2):197 - 213.
Reply to Gaus, Richardson, and Weber. [REVIEW]Christopher McMahon - 2003 - Philosophical Studies 116 (2):197-213.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-06-15

Downloads
99 (#215,375)

6 months
19 (#160,171)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Zach Weber
University of Otago

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Transfinite numbers in paraconsistent set theory.Zach Weber - 2010 - Review of Symbolic Logic 3 (1):71-92.
The non-triviality of dialectical set theory.Ross T. Brady - 1989 - In Graham Priest, Richard Routley & Jean Norman (eds.), Paraconsistent Logic: Essays on the Inconsistent. Philosophia Verlag. pp. 437--470.

View all 21 references / Add more references