- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
- From the Publisher via CrossRef (no proxy)
- amr.uwindsor.ca
(no proxy) - amr.uwindsor.ca [2] (no proxy)
- celt.uwindsor.ca (no proxy)
- celt.uwindsor.ca [2] (no proxy)
- celt.uwindsor.ca [3] (no proxy)
- hrgpapers.uwindsor.ca (no proxy)
- hrgpapers.uwindsor.ca [2] (no proxy)
- ojs.uwindsor.ca (no proxy)
- ojs.uwindsor.ca [2] (no proxy)
- phaenex.uwindsor.ca (no proxy)
- phaenex.uwindsor.ca [2] (no proxy)
- informallogic.ca (no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Leo Groarke and Christopher Tindale, "informal logic: A prolegomenon to good argument". [REVIEW]Mary Richardson - 1986 - Dialogue 25 (4):787.
Groundwork in the Theory of Argumentation: Selected Papers of J. Anthony Blair.David Hitchcock - 2014 - Informal Logic 34 (1):94-123.
Why Arguments from Expert Opinion are Weak Arguments.Moti Mizrahi - 2013 - Informal Logic 33 (1):57-79.
Informal Logic: A Prolegomenon to Good Argument Leo Groarke and Christopher Tindale Bristol, IN: Wyndham Hall Press, 1985. Pp. 70.Mary Richardson - 1986 - Dialogue 25 (4):787-.
The Social Nature of Argumentative Practices: The Philosophy of Argument and Audience Reception.Paula Olmos - 2018 - Informal Logic 38 (1):151-183.
You Will Respect My Authoritah!? A Reply to Botting.Moti Mizrahi - 2019 - Informal Logic 39 (1):106-122.
Why Arguments from Expert Opinion are still Weak: A Reply to Seidel.Moti Mizrahi - 2016 - Informal Logic 36 (2):238-252.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-10-30
Downloads
324 (#85,583)
6 months
44 (#105,943)
2013-10-30
Downloads
324 (#85,583)
6 months
44 (#105,943)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Inquiry: A New Paradigm for Critical Thinking.Mark Battersby (ed.) - 2018 - Windsor, Canada: Windsor Studies in Argumentation.
Recognizing Argument Types and Adding Missing Reasons.Christoph Lumer - 2019 - In Bart J. Garssen, David Godden, Gordon Mitchell & Jean Wagemans (eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA). [Amsterdam, July 3-6, 2018.]. Sic Sat. pp. 769-777.
Critical Thinking as Applied Epistemology: Relocating Critical Thinking in the Philosophical Landscape.Mark Battersby - 1989 - Informal Logic 11 (2).
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-wmc4m dc2