Paradoxes solved by simple relevance criteria

Logique Et Analyse 29 (113):3-40 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,774

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Les paradoxes et le langage.P. A. M. Seuren - 1987 - Logique Et Analyse 30 (120):365-383.
The paradoxes of strict implication.John L. Pollock - 1966 - Logique Et Analyse 34:180-96.
Les paradoxes et le langage.P. A. M. Sueren - 1987 - Logique Et Analyse 30 (20):365.
Dialetheism and Paradoxes of the Berry Family.Uwe Petersen - 1992 - Logique Et Analyse 35:273-89.
On paradoxes in naive set theory.Jon Perez Laraudogoitia - 1989 - Logique Et Analyse 32 (128):241-245.
1. Curry-type Paradoxes.Katalin BimbÓ - 2006 - Logique Et Analyse 49 (195):227-240.
On Mackie's Solution to Semantic Paradoxes.A. Tanesini - 1988 - Logique Et Analyse 31 (123-124):223-226.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-24

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Gerhard Schurz
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf

Citations of this work

Deontic logic.Paul McNamara - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Relevant deduction.Gerhard Schurz - 1991 - Erkenntnis 35 (1):391 - 437.
Understanding epistemic relevance.Luciano Floridi - 2008 - Erkenntnis 69 (1):69-92.
Dialogical connexive logic.Shahid Rahman & Helge Rückert - 2001 - Synthese 127 (1-2):105-139.

View all 23 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references