Anger in Legacies of Empire: Indigenous Peoples and Settler States

European Journal of Social Theory 7 (2):189-208 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Cultural norms and values, as well as historical, social, and legal contexts shape the public uses and expressions of particular emotions, including anger. In the settler states of Aotearoa New Zealand, Australia, and Canada, indigenous peoples and those who came later negotiate the unfinished business of empire. Their exchanges are framed in terms of ethnic identity and difference. It is argued here that anger plays a significant part in the legal and political processes of claim, denial, and response through which these differences are articulated and transacted. This article examines situations where people whose very naming is a product of European thought engage in the struggles of decolonization. The very different occasions and forms of anger over justice claims described illustrate the extent to which meanings are not shared in these societies.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,561

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Political Theory and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.Duncan Ivison, Paul Patton & Will Sanders (eds.) - 2000 - Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Indigenous Statistics.Tahu Kukutai & Maggie Walter - 2019 - In Pranee Liamputtong (ed.), Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences. Springer Singapore. pp. 1691-1706.
Indigeneity and the Settler Contract today.Robert Nichols - 2013 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 39 (2):165-186.
The Moral Legitimacy of Anger.Paul Muldoon - 2008 - European Journal of Social Theory 11 (3):299-314.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-25

Downloads
7 (#1,634,629)

6 months
3 (#1,467,341)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?