A Plausible Tale: Story and Theology in II Samuel 9–20, I Kings 1–2

Interpretation 35 (4):341-354 (1981)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The combination in the “succession narrative” of completely plausible candor about the human and confidence in the sovereign involvement of the Lord, poses the question of providence in the most profound way possible

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,793

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

2 Kings 23:1–20.Sally Brown - 2006 - Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 60 (1):68-70.
1 Samuel 20:1–17.Barry A. Jones - 2004 - Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 58 (2):172-174.
Book Review: 1–2 Kings. [REVIEW]Richard D. Nelson - 2007 - Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 61 (3):333-333.
Book Review: 1 & 2 Kings. [REVIEW]Pauline A. Viviano - 2008 - Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 62 (1):98-99.
An Appearance of Succession Requires a Succession of Appearances.Oliver Rashbrook - 2012 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 87 (3):584-610.
Book Review: 1 & 2 Kings. [REVIEW]Walter Harrelson - 2002 - Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 56 (1):84-86.
“We don't know where …” John 20:2.Paul S. Minear - 1976 - Interpretation 30 (2):125-139.
1 Samuel 1 & 2.Marjorie Menaul - 2001 - Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 55 (2):174-176.
Bible and Interpretation: The Collected Essays of James Barr: Volume I: Interpretation and Theology.James Barr - 2013 - Oxford University Press. Edited by John Barton & Ernest W. Nicholson.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
22 (#960,324)

6 months
4 (#1,246,862)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references