Hegel's undiscovered thesis-antithesis-synthesis dialectics: what only Marx and Tillich understood

Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Since Mueller’s 1958 article calling Hegelian dialectics a “legend,” it has been fashionable to deny that Hegel used thesis-antithesis-synthesis dialectics. But in truth, Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit has 28 dialectics hidden on four outline levels, and The Philosophy of History has 10 more on three outline levels. In Phenomenology’s macrodialectic, Hegel’s nonsupernatural Spirit–all reality, everything in the universe, including man and artificial objects–advances from unconscious + union (thesis) to conscious + separation (antithesis) to a synthesis of conscious (from the antithesis) + union (from the thesis). Previous interpretations of Phenomenology have missed this dialectic: they have assumed that Spirit’s journey begins with consciousness, whereas the journey actually begins in the primordial state of nature, before man arrives and provides Spirit with its Mind (the collective mind of man). Mind then misperceives itself as a multitude of separate alien “objects”–things other than itself. The macrodialectic and all other dialectics are based on Christianity’s Johannine separation-and-return mythology; all Hegelian dialectics separate from a concept in the thesis, going to that something’s opposite (antithesis), and then return to the thesis concept. Thus, in Hegel’s master-and-slave dialectic (God = master, man = slave), man advances from potential + freedom to actual + bondage (religiosity) to actual + freedom (atheism). Only Marx and Tillich understood Hegelian dialectics. Marx’s basic dialectic (one of four) saw history separating from and returning to Communism, going from communal ownership + poverty (primitive communism, or gens) to private ownership + wealth (slavery, feudalism, capitalism) to communal ownership + wealth (final communism). Tillich’s basic dialectic (one of many) separates from and returns to God, advancing from Yes to God + Yes to supernaturalism (theism) to No to God + No to supernaturalism (atheism) to Yes to God + No to supernaturalism (humanism: humanity is the nonsupernatural “God above the God of theism”).

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,937

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A New Exploration of Hegel's Dialectics.Xiaomang Deng - 2022 - New York, New York: Routledge. Edited by Lihuan Wu & Chad Austin Meyers.
The Hegelian Structure of Marx’s Thought.Paul Rosenberg - 2023 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 35 (4):332-413.
A new exploration of Hegel's Dialectics III: the three-dimensional structure.Deng Xiaomang - 2022 - London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. Edited by Lihuan Wu & Chad Austin Meyers.
Complementary dialectics of Kierkegaard and Barth: Barth's use of Kierkegaardian diastasis reassessed.Dr Peter S. Oh - 2007 - Neue Zeitschrift für Systematicsche Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 48 (4).
History and Truth in Hegel’s Phenomenology. [REVIEW]G. C. - 1980 - Review of Metaphysics 34 (1):168-170.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-08-24

Downloads
86 (#243,672)

6 months
3 (#1,470,822)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Leonard F. Wheat
Harvard University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references