The value of ideological diversity among university faculty

Social Philosophy and Policy 37 (2):90-113 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Conservatives in the United States have grown increasingly critical of universities and their faculty, convinced that professors are ideologues from the political left. Universities, for their part, have increasingly adopted a mantra of diversity and inclusivity, but have shown little interest in diversifying the political and ideological profile of their faculties. This essay argues that the lack of political diversity among American university faculty hampers the ability of universities to fulfill their core mission of advancing and disseminating knowledge. The argument is advanced through a series of four questions: Is it true that university faculty are not ideologically diverse? Why might it be true? Does it matter? How might it be fixed.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,865

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Stand Columbia.Michael S. Kochin - 2024 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 2024 (207):189-193.
Vulnerable to Contingency.James F. Keenan - 2020 - Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics 40 (2):221-236.
Cultivating virtue in the university.Jonathan Brant, Edward Brooks & Michael Lamb (eds.) - 2022 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-05-05

Downloads
34 (#662,872)

6 months
7 (#699,353)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Why are professors liberal?Neil Gross & Ethan Fosse - 2012 - Theory and Society 41 (2):127-168.
Professors and their politics: The policy views of social scientists.Daniel B. Klein & Charlotta Stern - 2005 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 17 (3-4):257-303.

Add more references