What is conscience?: Two traditions in the philosophy of conscience and the Korean judiciary branch’s approach to conscience

Korean Journal of Legal Philosophy 22 (2):239-304 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,063

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Implications for Moral Education of an Act of Conscience.Duho Kang - 2016 - Journal of Ethics: The Korean Association of Ethics 1 (109):1-22.
Cho Gwang-jo's Pure Conscience and Grief.SangSeong Lee - 2010 - THE JOURNAL OF KOREAN PHILOSOPHICAL HISTORY 30:7-36.
The Conscience Principle.Mark C. Murphy - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Research 22:387-407.
The Conscience Principle.Mark C. Murphy - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Research 22:387-407.
Freedom of Conscience: A Communal-based Approach.Owen Jeffrey Crocker - 2024 - Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform 29 (1):25-47.
Why Tolerate Conscience?François Boucher & Cécile Laborde - forthcoming - Criminal Law and Philosophy:1-21.
What is conscience and why is respect for it so important?Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (3):135-149.
The Public Conscience of the Law.David Dyzenhaus PhD - 2014 - Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy 43 (2):115-126.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-12

Downloads
17 (#1,138,780)

6 months
6 (#825,551)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references