Anselm, Truth, and Necessary Being

Philosophy 37 (141):257 - 258 (1962)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1017/s0031819100061994

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Anselm on Truth.Alice Ramos - 2009 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 83:183-197.
Baumer, I., Christoffels, H, Mainberger, Le domaine du sacré, ses zones de lumière et d’ombres. [REVIEW]E. Beltrán - 1968 - Augustinianum 8 (1):183-183.
Anselm on Truth.Alice Ramos - 2009 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 83:183-197.
Anzelm z Canterbury: natura, porządek, Bóg.Monika Malmon - 2020 - Przeglad Filozoficzny - Nowa Seria:187-197.
Anselm on Truth and Goodness.Alice Ramos - 2014 - Revista Española de Filosofía Medieval 21:85.
The Greatest Possible Being, by Jeff Speaks. [REVIEW]Graham Oppy - 2020 - Philosophical Review 129 (4):664-669.
Baumer and Glasgow on Ethical Egoism.John L. Lahey - 1976 - Philosophy Research Archives 2:142-149.
Necessary and contingent truth in William Whewell's antithetical theory of knowledge.Menachem Fisch - 1984 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 16 (4):275-314.
Anselm on truth.Thomas Williams & Sandra Visser - 2004 - In Brian Leftow (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Anselm. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. pp. 204-221.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
42 (#537,562)

6 months
5 (#1,067,832)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Anselm's ontological arguments.Norman Malcolm - 1960 - Philosophical Review 69 (1):41-62.
The ontological argument revisited.William P. Alston - 1960 - Philosophical Review 69 (4):452-474.

Add more references