Conventionalism: Poincaré, Duhem, Reichenbach

In James Robert Brown (ed.), Philosophy of Science: The Key Thinkers. New York: Continuum Books. pp. 32 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A recurrent theme in philosophy of science since the early twentieth century is the idea that at least some basic tenets within scientific theories ought to be understood as conventions. Various versions of this idea have come to be grouped together under the label ‘conventionalism’. This chapter presents and discusses some important historical stages in the development of conventionalism. Particular attention is paid to the contributions made by Henri Poincaré, Pierre Duhem and Hans Reichenbach.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Duhem, Quine and grünbaum on falsification.Gary Wedeking - 1969 - Philosophy of Science 36 (4):375-380.
Conventionalism, structuralism and neo-Kantianism in Poincaré’s philosophy of science.Milena Ivanova - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 52 (Part B):114-122.
Poincaré’s Impact on Twentieth-Century Philosophy of Science.Yemima Ben-Menahem - 2016 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 6 (2):257-273.
Karl Popper's Philosophy Of Science And Conventionalism.Krzysztof Szlachcic - 2008 - Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia 3 (1):19-40.
Convention: Poincaré and some of his critics.Yemima Ben-Menahem - 2001 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (3):471-513.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-07-05

Downloads
763 (#32,353)

6 months
118 (#47,469)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Torsten Wilholt
Universität Hannover

Citations of this work

Hans Reichenbach.Clark Glymour - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references