- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Leibniz 's Metaphysics: A Historical and Comparative Study by Catherine Wilson and Leibniz and Arnauld: A Commentaryon their Correspondence by Robert C. Sleigh, Jr [Book Review]
Journal of Philosophy 89 (3):151-165 (1992)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Robert C. Sleigh, Jr., Leibniz and Arnauld: A Commentary on their Correspondence Reviewed by.Nicholas Jolley - 1991 - Philosophy in Review 11 (6):419-420.
R. C. Sleigh, Jr., "Leibniz and Arnauld: A Commentary on Their Correspondence". [REVIEW]Steven M. Nadler - 1991 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 29 (3):494.
On Kant’s Knowledge of Leibniz’ Metaphysics—a Reply to Garber.Stefan Storrie - 2015 - Philosophia 43 (4):1147-1155.
Sleigh, R.C. jr., Leibniz and Arnauld. A Commentary on Their Correspondence. [REVIEW]F. Jespers - 1994 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 56 (2):364.
Leibniz and Arnauld: A Commentary on Their Correspondence by R. C. Sleigh. [REVIEW]Lynn Joy - 1992 - Isis 83:133-134.
When Did Leibniz Adopt the Pre-established Harmony?Paul Lodge - 1996 - The Leibniz Review 6:170-171.
When Did Leibniz Adopt the Pre-established Harmony?Paul Lodge - 1996 - The Leibniz Review 6:170-171.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-03-31
Downloads
68 (#306,071)
6 months
6 (#827,406)
2014-03-31
Downloads
68 (#306,071)
6 months
6 (#827,406)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Why Leibniz thinks Descartes was wrong and the Scholastics were right.Tyler Doggett - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 149 (1):1-18.
Leibniz on body, force and extension 1.Daniel Garber - 2005 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105 (3):363-384.
Leibniz and Arnauld. [REVIEW]Catherine Wilson - 1993 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 23 (4):661-674.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-wmc4m dc2