Models for prediction, explanation and control: recursive bayesian networks

Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 26 (1):5-33 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Recursive Bayesian Net (RBN) formalism was originally developed for modelling nested causal relationships. In this paper we argue that the formalism can also be applied to modelling the hierarchical structure of mechanisms. The resulting network contains quantitative information about probabilities, as well as qualitative information about mechanistic structure and causal relations. Since information about probabilities, mechanisms and causal relations is vital for prediction, explanation and control respectively, an RBN can be applied to all these tasks. We show in particular how a simple two-level RBN can be used to model a mechanism in cancer science. The higher level of our model contains variables at the clinical level, while the lower level maps the structure of the cell's mechanism for apoptosis

Other Versions

edition Casini, Lorenzo; Illari, Phyllis; Russo, Frederica; Williamson, Jon (2011) "Models for Prediction, Explanation and Control: Recursive Bayesian Networks". Theoria 26(1):5-33

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,793

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Another problem with RBN models of mechanisms.Alexander Gebharter - 2016 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 31 (2):177-188.
How to Model Mechanistic Hierarchies.Lorenzo Casini - 2016 - Philosophy of Science 83 (5):946-958.
Causal graphs and biological mechanisms.Alexander Gebharter & Marie I. Kaiser - 2014 - In Marie I. Kaiser, Oliver R. Scholz, Daniel Plenge & Andreas Hüttemann (eds.), Explanation in the special science: The case of biology and history. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 55-86.
Mechanisms, good and bad.Harold Kincaid - 2021 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 36 (2):173-189.
A formal framework for representing mechanisms?Alexander Gebharter - 2014 - Philosophy of Science 81 (1):138-153.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-11-26

Downloads
443 (#62,490)

6 months
18 (#152,793)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Federica Russo
University of Amsterdam
Lorenzo Casini
IMT School for Advanced Studies, Lucca
Jon Williamson
University of Manchester

Citations of this work

The Ontic Account of Scientific Explanation.Carl F. Craver - 2014 - In Marie I. Kaiser, Oliver R. Scholz, Daniel Plenge & Andreas Hüttemann (eds.), Explanation in the special science: The case of biology and history. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 27-52.
Constitutive Relevance, Mutual Manipulability, and Fat-Handedness.Michael Baumgartner & Alexander Gebharter - 2016 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67 (3):731-756.
Causal graphs and biological mechanisms.Alexander Gebharter & Marie I. Kaiser - 2014 - In Marie I. Kaiser, Oliver R. Scholz, Daniel Plenge & Andreas Hüttemann (eds.), Explanation in the special science: The case of biology and history. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 55-86.

View all 19 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references