Resolving disputes over frozen embryos: A new proposal

Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (2):172-185 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper proposes a principle for adjudicating conflicts between estranged couples over whether the frozen embryos they earlier created together ought to be gestated or destroyed. I argue that the fate of the embryos ought to be determined by the party who would be most harmed by having his or her preferences overruled. But I also claim that, when embryos are destroyed against the opposition of one of their co-creators, the individual at whose behest this was done owes compensation to his disappointed opposite number, in an amount that reflects the harm accruing to the latter as a result of the termination of the procreative project

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

New Zealand Policy on Frozen Embryo Disputes.Carolyn Mason - 2020 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 17 (1):121-131.
Resolving Disputes over Frozen Embryos.John A. Robertson - 1989 - Hastings Center Report 19 (6):7-12.
Adoption First? The Disposition of Human Embryos.Timothy F. Murphy - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (6):2013-101525.
The Case Against Thawing Unused Frozen Embryos.David T. Ozar - 1985 - Hastings Center Report 15 (4):7-12.
Embryonic Stem Cells and Property Rights.A. -K. M. Andersson - 2011 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (3):221-242.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-01-28

Downloads
44 (#510,722)

6 months
5 (#1,067,832)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jeremy Williams
University of Birmingham

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references