Sosa’s Safety Needs Supplementing, Not Saving

Logos and Episteme 9 (3):343-351 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Juan Comesaña argues that Halloween Party shows that Sosa’s (2002) disjunctive safety condition on knowledge is too strong. Mark McBride agrees, and proposes a modification to that condition in order to evade Halloween Party. I show that that Halloween Party is not a counterexample to Sosa’s disjunctive safety condition. However the condition, as well as McBride’s modification to it, is insufficient for true belief (or acceptance) to be knowledge. Sosa’s condition needs supplementing in some way that would yield a full analysis of knowledge.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Saving Sosa’s Safety.Mark McBride - 2012 - Logos and Episteme 3 (4):637-652.
Unsafe Knowledge.Juan Comesaña - 2005 - Synthese 146 (3):395-404.
Sosa’s virtue account vs. responsibilism.Xingming Hu - 2024 - Asian Journal of Philosophy 3 (1):1-16.
Safety in Sosa.John Greco - 2018 - Synthese 197 (12):5147-5157.
Need knowing and acting be SSS‐Safe?Jaakko Hirvelä & Niall Paterson - 2021 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 10 (2):127-134.
Is Safety In Danger?Fernando Broncano-Berrocal - 2014 - Philosophia 42 (1):1-19.
Knowledge Under Threat.Tomas Bogardus - 2014 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88 (2):289-313.
review of Sosa Knowing Full Well. [REVIEW]Adam Morton - 2011 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 23.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-10-16

Downloads
22 (#977,147)

6 months
7 (#722,178)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John N. Williams
Singapore Management University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references