To err is humeant

Philosophia Mathematica 7 (3):247-257 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

George Boolos, Crispin Wright, and others have demonstrated how most of Frege's treatment of arithmetic can be obtained from a second-order statement that Boolos dubbed ‘Hume's principle’. This note explores the historical evidence that Frege originally planned to develop a philosophical approach to numbers in which Hume's principle is central, but this strategy was abandoned midway through his Grundlagen.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,676

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Generalizing boolos’ theorem.Graham Leach-Krouse - 2017 - Review of Symbolic Logic 10 (1):80-91.
Frege, Boolos, and logical objects.David J. Anderson & Edward N. Zalta - 2004 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 33 (1):1-26.
Hume = small Hume.Jeffrey Ketland - 2002 - Analysis 62 (1):92–93.
Frege's Other Program.Aldo Antonelli & Robert May - 2005 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 46 (1):1-17.
A Vindication of Logicism.Peter Roeper - 2016 - Philosophia Mathematica 24 (3):360-378.
On finite hume.Fraser Macbride - 2000 - Philosophia Mathematica 8 (2):150-159.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
139 (#159,953)

6 months
18 (#159,252)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

On the Origin and Status of our Conception of Number.William Demopoulos - 2000 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 41 (3):210-226.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references