A Reply to George Lucas’ Critique of Reason and Justice

The Owl of Minerva 22 (1):91-93 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In face of the fashionable dogma that we must choose between procedural ethics and communitarianism, the neglected alternative of an ethics without foundations warrants careful demarcation. George Lucas aims at undermining its distinctiveness, treating the system of right argued for in Reason and Justice as a bastard theory incongruously melding the formalism of procedural ethics with modes of community that should better be conceived as historical conventions.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 105,586

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-18

Downloads
59 (#397,578)

6 months
3 (#1,174,593)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Richard Winfield
University of Georgia

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references