The nature of causation

Philosophy of Science 7 (2):192-204 (1940)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Strange as it may seem, the traditional principle of causality is based on two contradictory assumptions, both of which are generally accepted, explicitly or implicitly, by the contemporary physicists as well as philosophers. That they are not always willing to acknowledge this paradoxical fact, does not save them from the perplexing situation. The two assumptions, in brief, are: That nothing can act at a distance or across an interval of time, without something mediating between the bodies or events; and That every cause precedes its effect and may be located at a distance from it.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,937

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Nature of Causation.Eli Karlin - 1948 - Review of Metaphysics 2 (5):53 - 98.
The Nature of Causation.Frank Jackson - 1976 - Urbana : University of Illinois Press.
Exclusion, overdetermination, and the nature of causation.Thomas D. Bontly - 2005 - Journal of Philosophical Research 30:261-282.
The Nature of Causation: A Singularist Account.Michael Tooley - 1990 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 20 (sup1):271-322.
The Nature of Causation.Frank Jackson - 1982 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 47 (2):470-473.
Nature and Causation of the Galvanic Phenomenon.Boris Sidis & Louis Nelson - 1910 - Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 7 (15):416-417.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
38 (#593,075)

6 months
18 (#162,420)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references