Is epiphenomenalism refutable?

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 13 (52):303-306 (1963)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

original Wisdom, J. O. (1962) "The refutability of 'irrefutable' laws". British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 13(52):303-306

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

"Foundations of Inference in Natural Science." By J. O. Wisdom.W. I. B. Beveridge - 1952 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 3 ([9/12]):291.
Comments on the alleged proof of epiphenomenalism.Wilbur Long - 1952 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 3 (February):355-58.
Epiphenomenalism and Machines: A Discussion of Van Rooijen's Critique of Popper.Davor Pećnjak - 1989 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40 (3):404-408.
Can a machine be conscious?David L. Thompson - 1965 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 16 (May):33-43.
Mr. Farrell and the refutability of psychoanalysis.Michael Martin - 1964 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 7 (1-4):80 – 98.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
47 (#467,133)

6 months
11 (#337,502)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Popper's metaphysical research program for the human sciences.Noretta Koertge - 1975 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 18 (4):437 – 462.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references