The "is-ought" gap: Deduction or justification?

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 36 (2):233-245 (1975)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/2107056

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,174

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Is-Ought' Gap: Deduction or Justification?Kenneth S. Witkowski - 1975 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 36 (2):233.
What is deduction?H. R. Smart - 1944 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 5 (1):37-49.
Deduction and intuitive induction.Charles F. Kielkopf - 1966 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 26 (3):379-390.
A note on `is' and `ought' in phenomenological perspective.Lester Embree - 1979 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 39 (4):595-597.
Moral Knowledge By Deduction.Declan Smithies - 2021 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 104 (3):537-563.
Kitcher on the Deduction.Lucy Allais - 2013 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 87 (1):229-236.
On the uses of `is' and `ought'.T. D. Crawford - 1979 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 39 (4):592-594.
Naturalized epistemology and the is/ought gap.Javier Rodríguez-Alcazar - 1996 - Dialectica 50 (2):137-152.
A Justification of Rationality.Peter A. Facione - 1977 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 38 (2):262-264.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
56 (#385,917)

6 months
11 (#352,895)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references