Is There Any Need for Non-Classical Logic in Science?

Grazer Philosophische Studien 12 (1):119-129 (1981)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The role of classical logic as the base of formalized scientific theories seems to be unshakable. Yet legitimate doubts about its universal applicability in science have resulted in the development of alternative systems, among which constructive and modal logic are discussed in syntactic and semantic terms.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,937

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is There Any Need for Non-Classical Logic in Science?Ryszard Wójcicki - 1981 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 12 (1):119-129.
Alternative Logics and Applied Mathematics.Timothy Williamson - 2018 - Philosophical Issues 28 (1):399-424.
Introduction to computability logic.Giorgi Japaridze - 2003 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 123 (1-3):1-99.
Accepting a Logic, Accepting a Theory.Timothy Williamson - 2024 - In Yale Weiss & Romina Birman (eds.), Saul Kripke on Modal Logic. Cham: Springer. pp. 409-433.
Old Quantum Theory: A Paraconsistent Approach.Bryson Brown - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:397 - 411.
Semantic approaches in the philosophy of science.Emma B. Ruttkamp - 1999 - South African Journal of Philosophy 18 (2):100-148.
Anti-exceptionalism about logic.Ole Thomassen Hjortland - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (3):631-658.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-04

Downloads
70 (#300,328)

6 months
15 (#206,160)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references