Rethinking Hegel's Conceptual Realism

Review of Metaphysics 72 (2):331-70 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, I contest increasingly common "realist" interpretations of Hegel's theory of "the concept" (der Begriff), offering instead a "isomorphic" conception of the relation of concepts and the world. The isomorphism recommended, however, is metaphysically deflationary, for I show how Hegel's conception of conceptual form creates a conceptually internal standard for the adequacy of concepts. No "sideways-on" theory of the concept-world relationship is envisioned. This standard of conceptual adequacy is also "graduated" in that it allows for a lack of fit between concept and world. The possibility for a "maximally isomorphic" fit between concept and world obtains through the teleological realization of concepts, which marks especially the "artificial" world of human culture (law, art, religion, etc.). Some of the most seemingly exaggerated claims Hegel makes about the concept, I contend, can be understood when we consider the significance Hegel ascribes to human making, which is provided for in his conceptual theory. But my framework provides an interpretive key for the way Hegel sees concepts imperfectly realized in the natural world as well.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-02-13

Downloads
987 (#21,537)

6 months
182 (#19,430)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

W. Clark Wolf
St. John's College, Annapolis

Citations of this work

The Myth of the Taken: Why Hegel Is Not a Conceptualist.W. Clark Wolf - 2019 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 27 (3):399-421.
The Freedom of Solar Systems.Mathis Koschel - forthcoming - Hegel Bulletin:1-30.
Rethinking Maker: Hegel's Realism Revisited.George Webster - 2022 - Hegel Bulletin 44 (2):297-320.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references