Some empirical qualifications to the arguments for an argumentative theory

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2):92-93 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The empirical research on the psychology of argumentation suggests that people are prone to fallacies and suboptimal performance in generating, comprehending, and evaluating arguments. Reasoning and argumentation are interrelated skills that use many of the same cognitive processes. The processes we use to convince others are also used to convince ourselves. Argumentation would be ineffective if we couldn't reason for ourselves

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,937

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
24 (#909,478)

6 months
6 (#858,075)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christopher Wolfe
Marquette University

References found in this work

Myside bias in thinking about abortion.Jonathan Baron - 1995 - Thinking and Reasoning 1 (3):221 – 235.

Add more references