- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Fix it and be damned: A reply to Laudan
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40 (3):376-388 (1989)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Normative naturalism and the challenge of relativism: Laudan versus Worrall on the justification of methodological principles.Howard Sankey - 1996 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 10 (1):37 – 51.
If It Ain’t Broke, Don’t Fix It.Larry Laudan - 1989 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40 (3):369-375.
Review. Beyond positivism and relativism: theory, method, and evidence. Larry Laudan.André Kukla - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (3):447-454.
Science and Relativism: Some Key Controversies in the Philosophy of Science. Larry Laudan. [REVIEW]Jarrett Leplin - 1992 - Philosophy of Science 59 (4):713-714.
Review of Imre Lakatos, John Worrall and Elie Zahar: Proofs and Refutations: The Logic of Mathematical Discovery. [REVIEW]W. V. Quine - 1977 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 28 (1):81-82.
Science and Relativism: Some Key Controversies in the Philosophy of Science by Larry Laudan. [REVIEW]Paul Feyerabend - 1992 - Isis 83:367-368.
Review of Science and Relativism: Some Key Controversies in the Philosophy of Science. Larry Laudan. [REVIEW]Paul Feyerabend - 1992 - Isis 83 (2):367-368.
Review of Arthur Donovan, Larry Laudan and Rachel Laudan: Scrutinizing Science: Empirical Studies of Scientific Change. [REVIEW]John Preston - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (4):1063-1065.
Ramsey Sentence Realism as an Answer to the Pessimistic Meta‐Induction.Mark Newman - 2005 - Philosophy of Science 72 (5):1373-1384.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
369 (#77,942)
6 months
7 (#740,041)
2009-01-28
Downloads
369 (#77,942)
6 months
7 (#740,041)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Evidence in medicine and evidence-based medicine.John Worrall - 2007 - Philosophy Compass 2 (6):981–1022.
Epistemic relativism and the problem of the criterion.Howard Sankey - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (4):562-570.
Best theory scientific realism.Gerald Doppelt - 2014 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 4 (2):271-291.
Methodological pluralism, normative naturalism and the realist aim of science.Howard Sankey - 2000 - In Robert Nola & Howard Sankey (eds.), After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend: Recent Issues in Theories of Scientific Method. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 211-229.
References found in this work
Science and Values: The Aims of Science and Their Role in Scientific Debate.Larry Laudan - 1984 - University of California Press.
The Open Society and its Enemies.Karl R. Popper - 1952 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 142:629-634.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-667477cd97-wmc4m dc2