Reframing the Issue in 13.18 of the Analects of Confucius: Family Privileges in Criminal Litigation and the Confucian Insight

Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 23 (3):377-395 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The sheep case in Analects 13.18 has generated a heated debate in contemporary Chinese philosophy for more than a decade. One side in this debate criticizes Confucius’ view in the sheep case and the other side defends Confucius’ position. Neither side’s reading of 13.18 is satisfactory. I argue that something important in the text has been overlooked and this omission may explain why neither side gives a satisfying reading. I offer in this essay a new reading of the sheep case which pays attention to what the existent interpretations have overlooked in the text. This new focus will give us a new perspective to reframe the issue in question and to defend the Confucian position in a more convincing way. On the new interpretation, Confucius’ position in the sheep case suggests a sensible and reasonable way for the state to balance some important social interests which the state seeks to protect.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,459

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-06-22

Downloads
15 (#1,244,127)

6 months
11 (#364,844)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Xiaomei Yang
Southern Connecticut State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations