Branching Time Axiomatized With the Use of Change Operators

Logic Journal of the IGPL 31 (5):894-906 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We present a temporal logic of branching time with four primitive operators: |$\exists {\mathcal {C}}$| – it may change whether; |$\forall {\mathcal {C}} $| – it must change whether; |$\exists \Box $| – it may be endlessly unchangeable that; and |$\forall \Box $| – it must be endlessly unchangeable that. Semantically, operator |$\forall {\mathcal {C}}$| expresses a change in the logical value of the given formula in every state that may be an immediate successor of the one considered, while |$\exists {\mathcal {C}}$| expresses a change in the logical value of the given formula in some state that is a possible immediate successor. |$\forall {\mathcal {C}} $| and |$\exists {\mathcal {C}}$| are not normal operators, they are not mutually definable and have unusual properties: |$\forall {\mathcal {C}} A\leftrightarrow \forall {\mathcal {C}} \neg A$| and |$\exists {\mathcal {C}} A \leftrightarrow \exists {\mathcal {C}} \neg A$| are axioms. Operators |$\exists \Box $| and |$\forall \Box $| express endless unchangeability in some and all paths, respectively. Our axiomatization contains two infinitary rules that allow one to obtain |$\exists \Box A$| from infinitely many combinations of formulas with |$A, \neg, \forall {\mathcal {C}}, \land $|⁠, and to get |$\forall \Box A$| from infinitely many combinations of formulas with |$A, \neg, \exists {\mathcal {C}}, \land $|⁠. We show that our formalism is complete by presenting a bridge between our logic and logic |$\textsf {UB}$|⁠, which is a fragment of |$\textsf {CTL}$| in which until operators does not occur.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

First-Order Logic of Change.Kordula Świętorzecka - forthcoming - Logic Journal of the IGPL.
Some remarks on category of the real line.Kyriakos Keremedis - 1999 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 38 (3):153-162.
More on fréchet–urysohn ideals.Salvador García Ferreira & Osvaldo Guzmán - 2022 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 87 (2):829-851.
Ways of Destruction.Barnabás Farkas & Lyubomyr Zdomskyy - 2022 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 87 (3):938-966.
Model theory of the regularity and reflection schemes.Ali Enayat & Shahram Mohsenipour - 2008 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 47 (5):447-464.
A small reflection principle for bounded arithmetic.Rineke Verbrugge & Albert Visser - 1994 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 59 (3):785-812.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-09-28

Downloads
18 (#1,100,493)

6 months
8 (#546,836)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

First-Order Logic of Change.Kordula Świętorzecka - forthcoming - Logic Journal of the IGPL.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Physics.Daniel W. Aristotle & Graham - 2018 - Hackett Publishing Company.
New Essays on Human Understanding.G. W. Leibniz - 1981 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 45 (3):489-490.
Logics of Time and Computation.Robert Goldblatt - 1990 - Studia Logica 49 (2):284-286.
Logics of essence and accident.Joao Marcos - 2005 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 34 (1):43-56.
A note on logics of essence and accident.David R. Gilbert & Giorgio Venturi - 2020 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 28 (5):881-891.

View all 11 references / Add more references