Gottesbeweis oder Gedankenexperiment christlicher Theologie? Zu Dombrowskis Verteidigung des Ontologischen Arguments

Jahrbuch für Religionsphilosophie 8:69-91 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper argues that Daniel A. Dombrowski's defence of a version of the ontological argument for the existence of God fails.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,369

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Thought Experimenting with God. Revisiting the Ontological Argument.Yiftach J. H. Fehige - 2009 - Neue Zeitschrift für Systematicsche Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 51 (3):249-267.
The Ontological Argument.Sara L. Uckelman - 2011 - In Michael Bruce & Steven Barbone (eds.), Just the Arguments. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K.: Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 25–27.
Saint Anselm and Gaunilo on the Existence of God.P. Alpár Gergely - forthcoming - Studia Universitatis Babeş-Bolyai Philosophia:75-84.
Higher-order ontological arguments.Graham Oppy - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (5):1066-1078.
Makin on the Ontological Argument.Graham Oppy - 1991 - Philosophy 66 (255):106 - 114.
Anselm von Canterbury, Proslogion II-IV: Gottesbeweis oder Widerlegung des Toren?Gangolf Schrimpf - 1994 - Frankfurt am Main: Verlag Josef Knecht. Edited by Anselm.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-11-05

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references