A task-oriented taxonomy of visual completion

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):780-781 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Differences and similarities between modal and amodal completions can only be understood by considering the goals of visual completion: unity, shape, and perceptual quality. Pessoa et al. cannot reject representational accounts of vision because of flaws with isomorphic representations of perceptual quality: representations and processes for perceptual quality (modal completion) and most likely dissociable from those for unity and shape (nonmodal completions)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,401

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Filling-in: One or many?Luiz Pessoa, Evan Thompson & Alva Noë - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (6):1137-1139.
How do we see what is not there?Lothar Spillmann & John S. Werner - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):773-774.
The functional effects of modal versus amodal filling-in.Greg Davis & Jon Driver - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):752-753.
Amodal Completion: Mental Imagery or 3D Modeling?Christopher Gauker - forthcoming - Review of Philosophy and Psychology:1-23.
Amodal completion and relationalism.Bence Nanay - 2022 - Philosophical Studies 179 (8):2537-2551.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
19 (#1,120,317)

6 months
5 (#702,808)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references