The Constraining Influence of the Revolutionary on the Growth of the Field

Axiomathes 32 (6):1339-1373 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article draws attention to a pattern of development within science and other intellectual research communities that has received virtually no mention. We propose that subsequent dominance of a research community by a figure responsible for significant innovation often delays progress in the field. During the period in which the revolutionary continues to influence research in a community, far too frequently the effect is to freeze progress within the limited directions which the revolutionary sanctions.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,401

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-10-20

Downloads
22 (#1,015,764)

6 months
1 (#1,572,794)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Freud, Biologist of the Mind: Beyond the Psychoanalytic Legend.Frank J. Sulloway - 1979 - Journal of the History of Biology 15 (2):317-318.
Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge.Imre Lakatos, Alan Musgrave, Roger C. Buck & Robert S. Cohen - 1972 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 23 (3):266-274.

View all 10 references / Add more references