Penetrating the impenetrable?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):401-401 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A distinction is made between structural and semantic knowledge, focusing on the possible influences of the latter. To the extent that early vision may be influenced by object-identity, it would seem necessary to evoke compiled transducers to explain such an influence. Compiled transducers may furnish a way in which vision can be and is penetrated

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,369

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Penetrating the impenetrable.Georges Rey - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (1):149-150.
Is visual recognition entirely impenetrable?Azriel Rosenfeld - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):391-392.
Complexities of face perception and categorisation.Vicki Bruce, Steve Langton & Harold Hill - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):369-370.
Knowledge and intention can penetrate early vision.Mary A. Peterson - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):389-390.
Is early visual processing attention impenetrable?Su-Ling Yeh & I.-Ping Chen - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):400-400.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
27 (#831,416)

6 months
9 (#502,853)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references