For ‘art’ to be ‘art’, it has to be strange and disturbing

Alldaynight.Info (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

What follows here is not a definition of art by decree. Nor is this some kind of art manifesto. We are not saying this is how art should be, or could be, but how it is, if you let go of the prison of aesthetics, and follow an infinitely more interesting conceptual trail. This is about uncovering and identifying an approach to art which avoids the triviality of sensory-based aesthetic theory and moves instead towards exploring the experiential worlds that art presents us with. And this approach is not about diminishing the sensory enjoyment of artworks, but about placing them in a much richer context, where they can work a far greater magic.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Virtue Theory of Aesthetics.David M. Woodruff - 2001 - The Journal of Aesthetic Education 35 (3):23--36.
Reflexões Acerca da Definição Estética de Arte de Monroe Beardsley.Rosi Leny Morokawa - 2019 - Philosophica: International Journal for the History of Philosophy 27 (53):141-154.
Counterfactual Reasoning in Art Criticism.Angela Sun - 2022 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 80 (3):276-285.
How to frame edible art.Adam Andrzejewski - 2018 - Nordic Journal of Aesthetics 27 (55-56):82-97.
Philosophical perspectives on art.Stephen Davies - 2007 - New York;: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-11

Downloads
2,273 (#5,258)

6 months
337 (#5,952)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

.R. Edgley & R. Osborne (eds.) - 1985 - Verso.

Add more references