A preferential framework for trivialization-resistant reasoning with inconsistent information

In Luis Farinas del Cerro, Andreas Herzig & Jerome Mengin (eds.), Logics in Artificial Intelligence. Springer. pp. 463--475 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,518

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Correction to: Reasoning with inconsistent precedents.Ilaria Canavotto - forthcoming - Artificial Intelligence and Law:1-4.
A logic for reasoning with inconsistent knowledge.Nico Roos - 1992 - Artificial Intelligence 57 (1):69-103.
Reasoning with different levels of uncertainty.Ofer Arieli - 2003 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 13 (3):317-343.
Reasoning about agent programs using ATL-Like logics.Nitin Yadav & Sebastian Sardina - 2012 - In Luis Farinas del Cerro, Andreas Herzig & Jerome Mengin (eds.), Logics in Artificial Intelligence. Springer. pp. 437--449.
Three-valued logics for incomplete information and epistemic logic.Davide Ciucci & Didier Dubois - 2012 - In Luis Farinas del Cerro, Andreas Herzig & Jerome Mengin (eds.), Logics in Artificial Intelligence. Springer. pp. 147--159.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-28

Downloads
9 (#1,534,659)

6 months
2 (#1,696,787)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references