The moral basis of animal-assisted therapy

Society and Animals 14 (2):179-199 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Is nonhuman animal-assisted therapy a form of exploitation? After exploring possible moral vindications of AAT and after establishing a distinction between "use" and "exploitation," the essay distinguishes between forms of animal-assisted therapy that are morally unobjectionable and those modes of it that ought to be abolished

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,888

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Animal assisted therapy in children with disabilities.Olivera Rašić - Canevska - 2020 - Годишен зборник на Филозофскиот факултет/The Annual of the Faculty of Philosophy in Skopje 73:439-448.
The Welfare-based Defense of Zoos.Tzachi Zamir - 2007 - Society and Animals 15 (2):191-201.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-31

Downloads
387 (#73,766)

6 months
10 (#404,653)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan - 2004 - Univ of California Press.
The case for animal rights.Tom Regan - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring ethics: an introductory anthology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 425-434.
The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan - 1985 - Human Studies 8 (4):389-392.
Taking Animals Seriously: Mental Life and Moral Status.David DeGrazia (ed.) - 1996 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Taking Animals Seriously: Mental Life and Moral Status.David Degrazia - 1999 - Philosophical Quarterly 49 (195):246-247.

View all 8 references / Add more references